BCI Moves SC Proposing 3 Years of Bar Experience For Judicial Service Exam. Check out the Details!

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on email
Email
Share on print
Print
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

The latest notification released by the Bar Council of India (BCI) on 2nd January 2021, has successfully snatched the attention of the Judicial Service Exam aspirants. BCI has filed an application in the Honorable Supreme Court of India for updating the eligibility criteria for the Judicial Service ExamIt has proposed a minimum of three years of experience in advocacy after graduating as an essential to sit for the Judicial Service Exam. The State Bar Councils have also supported this decision in the majority. Currently, fresh Graduates are eligible to sit for the exam and BCI is questioning this standard. 

Everything You Need to Know About Online Internships: Click here

Reasoning 

The Bar came up with this recommendation for a variety of reasons. It has observed that the Judicial Officers who have freshly graduated are incapable of doing their job correctly. There are two phases to the prevalent problems:  

  • The judicial officers often act clueless about the crucial mannerisms and responsibilities of the court. This happens as they did not gain experience as advocates or litigants. BCI regarded them as “Incapable and inept” along with being “Impolite and impractical”.  
  • This inexperience in regards to court authority and management is affecting the system in an obstructive manner. It is being a barrier to smooth, fast, and proper administration of judicial functions.

Past Modifications

It is important to note that this proposition is not a new one. In fact, until 2002, the essential criterion of a minimum of three years‘ experience in advocacy was in effect. But this was altered in the case of All India Judges Association and Others vs Union of India. Herein, it was concluded that the young lawyers were not opting for Judicial Examinations after advocating for three years. The position of Judicial Officer was no more “attractive enough” to them. But this has generated the present-day problems of inefficiency, indecency, and tardiness. 

Current Position

The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission has taken action in favour of BCI’s standpointOn 3rd December 2020, it released a notification about the updated eligibility criteria for the AP State Judicial Service examination, incorporating the standard of advocacy experience. The details are similar to BCI’s recommendation, i.e., a minimum of three years of experience in the field of advocacy. This is for the appointment of civil judges in the Junior Division. 

Sample Moot Court Memorials (Best): FREE Download

This decision of the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission was challenged by petitioner Mr Regalagadda Venkatesh. He filed a petition against the state of Andhra Pradesh calling this criterion of three years of experience in the issued notification “illegal and unwarranted”. 

At this stage, BCI will be pleading before the Supreme Court of India to consider the recommendation of minimum of three years of Bar experience as an eligibility criterion to sit for the Judicial Service Exam. It wants to re-establish the previous eligibility criteria before the 2002 modification in the case of All India Judges Association Vs UOI. 

Reactions 

Even though this BCI notification has received responses, the majority of the folks from the legal field agree with this suggestion. Most individuals shared the sentiments of the BCI relating to the aforementioned difficulties arising due to inexperienced Judicial Officers. 

Learn the art of using Bluebook and Oscola through our
Online course on Citation Methods!

But when it came to the aspirants of the Judicial Service Examthey were not necessarily satisfied with these turns of events. They expressed distress over the fact that the full integrated course of law itself takes 5 years to complete. At that point, if they opt for Judicial Services, it will take them another 3 years before being eligible to sit for the exam. This will elongate the whole process to 8 years, which is a huge amount of time to devote to. Not a lot of people can afford to sit and study for that long before properly establishing their career. 

Time To Ponder 

At this point, what, according to you, should be the correct step by the SC about the proposed suggestions? Whose concerns should be given the highest priority? Below is the link to the official website of the Bar Council of India, check it out for more information on Judicial Service Examinations.

Official Website Of BCI

About the Author: Madhuja Chatterjee is a 1st year Student from the School of Law, CHRIST  University, Bangalore. She has always been young at heart, curious and eager to explore the fascinating subject of Content Writing.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Lipi Garg

Lipi Garg

Lipi is the Assistant Publishing Editor of Memo Pundits. For help in publishing details of any event, please email at lipi.garg@memopundits.com

Join Memo Pundits’ FREE Whatsapp Group for the latest updates and insights for Law Students.

Related Posts
Primary? Secondary? Binding? Persuasive?Do you sometimes get confused by these terms?

Here is a free guide to help you out!

Scroll to Top